PUBLICATION

Pharmacogenomics Implementation Training Improves Self-Efficacy and Competency to Drive Adoption in Clinical Practice

Administration of pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing in clinical practice has been suboptimal, presumably due to lack of PGx education. Here, we aim to evaluate the standpoint of PGx testing among a diverse group of healthcare professionals (HCPs) through conducting surveys before and after training.

PublicationsPharmacogenomics Implementation Training Improves Self-Efficacy and Competency to Drive Adoption in Clinical Practice

Jun 27, 2021

Pharmacogenomics Implementation Training Improves Self-Efficacy and Competency to Drive Adoption in Clinical Practice

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) focuses on the influence of genetic variations on drug response (Just et al., 2017). PGx is progressing from identifying drug-gene pairs to assimilating into clinical practice (Frick et al., 2016). A recent study conducted in Singapore observed that 30% of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were caused by at least one drug with a PGx clinical annotation, suggesting the potential to prevent ADR occurrence via PGx testing (Chan et al., 2016). Despite PGx testing demonstrating its potential to enhance medication safety and efficacy (Dunnenberger et al., 2015), its utility in clinical practice has been suboptimal (Chan et al., 2017), specifically in Asia (Lee et al., 2017). The lack of PGx education is an often-cited barrier to the widespread implementation of PGx (Mccullough et al., 2011; Kisor et al., 2015; Luzum and Luzum, 2016; Kisor and Farrell 2019).

Read more about it here.